Monday, December 10, 2007

Globalization, Fact or Fiction?

American Universalism is the condition in which different cultures around the world begin to adopt American characteristics such as the English language, brand names, entertainment, and food. Globalization is the idea of internationalism, of things extending to other parts of the globe and making it worldwide. The main difference between these two ideas is that in American Universalism, America is the main power influencing the rest of the world, whereas in globalization, all countries are exchanging ideas, cultures, and knowledge more equally. However, there is not a clear difference between globalization and American Universalism because American Universalism is a type of globalization. Therefore, I believe globalization is the reality in our world because of free trade, world organizations, environmental issues all of us must face, and fashion.

The United Nations is a great example of globalization because it is a group of 192 countries working together for the interest of the whole world, and it is not controlled by America. The United States became part of the United Nations in 1945 along with 50 other countries with a goal of solving problems like world hunger, world peace, and universal education. Also, they work as the world’s court on morality, and they work together to solve world problems like AIDS and global warming.

The International Bank of Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), also known as the World Bank, is another example of a world organization that is made possible by globalization. It was started in 1944 and now has 185 members, including the United States of America, France, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom. The World Bank’s goal is “to reduce global poverty” by “[helping] people help themselves and their environment” (World Bank.org).

Global trade has become much easier over the past two hundred years because of technological advances in transportation and communication. The United States’ economy, styles, and trends influence the rest of the world. However, America is also influenced by other nations’ culture and trends, like foreign cars and technology like, Toyota, Nissan, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz are all foreign companies that make cars that have become the new standard in America instead of Ford, Chrysler, or GM becoming the world’s standard for vehicles. Also, Japanese companies like Sony and Toshiba are commonly seen on computers and DVD players in America instead of Apple or HP becoming the world’s computer. America is influenced by what happens in other major countries like Japan, China, and India because we are technologically and economically linked. America has Hollywood movies, famous pop singers, and name brand clothes and food like Nike and McDonald’s. However, America imports far more of their products from other countries than they export to them. This is a sure sign that American Universalism is false, because one of the main concepts of Globalization is that America is influencing all the other countries in the world without being influenced back. In 2005, America imported $243.5 billion worth of goods and services from China, as opposed to the $41.9 billion exported to China from America according to the United States Census Bureau for 2005. What both American and foreign consumers want is quality and a fair price for their products and services, whether it is an American product or not. This is why free trade is so important, and organizations like the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement help make globalization possible. This disproves American Universalism, because the essence of American Universalism is a one sided trade of products and ideas.

America is one of the last developed countries to focus a large amount of resources on environmental problems such as global warming, and only recently did President Bush acknowledge the existence of global warming. The environment is something that affects us all, and it is something that we all must share. Therefore, it must be a world effort to lower our CO2 emissions and help stop global warming. Recently, China bypassed America as the largest contributor of carbon dioxide emissions, because they do not have emissions regulations and they have a quickly growing economy. However, as of 2004, America contributed 22.2% of all carbon dioxide emissions for the world according to Proceedings of the National Academy of Science in 2007. Global warming is a problem that was caused globally, not just by America, and therefore must be solved with global participation.

Fashion is another example of globalization, because new fashion trends in one area of the world, like Paris, become the trends for the whole world. The fashion found in Paris and other fashion capitals, like New York and Milan, are quickly adopted in Asian countries because of the quick spread of information and products made possible by globalization. This causes a loss of cultural identity, and often destroys local cultures by lessening the uniqueness between the various cultures of the world. One such example is India, where their world is quickly changing as they industrialize. They are taking the jobs from the western countries because they want to become self sustaining and are able to be competitive with American wages, which is the essence of globalization. As they do so, their culture is conflicted between their traditional Hindu culture and clothing and the western, modernized society that they are part of because of globalization. Many successful Indians work as call center operators in Bangalore, a quickly developing westernized city. They are constantly conflicted between their traditional dress and traditions, and the culture of their customers that they talk to everyday on the phone. Many women must choose between the traditional customs of staying in the home or going into the workforce like they see in the other developed counties. This cultural conflict is caused by globalization. International trade is an integral part of globalization, and some believe it negatively affects culture by mixing them, like in India. However, others believe globalization has had a positive effect on the world by helping the world’s economy and creating more competition in the global market.

If the United States suddenly collapsed, globalization would still go on. The United Nations, the World Bank, global trade, environmental regulation, and fashion all show the effects of globalization. Many of the world’s countries have joined world organizations to found ways to work together to help fix world problems, which is a form of globalization. Globalization is a two-way street, and although America is a large contributor to CO2 emissions, everyone has contributed. That is why the world must work together to help reduce and regulate emissions to help stop global warming, none of which would be possible without globalization.

Work Cited

Daniel Workman, “America’s Trade Buddies, Top Ten U.S. Export and Import Partners.” Suite 101. 21 November 2006.

25 November 2007 http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/2005pr/final_revisions/exh13tl.pdf

Raupach, M.R., G. Marland, P. Ciais, C. Quéré, J. Canadell, G. Klepper & C. Field. "Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions." Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (2007). 104 (24): 10288-93.

“Working for a World Free of Poverty.” The World Bank. 26 November 2007.

26 November 2007

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Religion’s Influence on Abortion

Abortion has been a controversial issue for hundreds of years in America and around the world. People’s opinions have greatly been influenced by the morality of abortion based on their personal religious views. With 87% of Americans identifying themselves as being religious, it is hard, if not impossible, to disallow those religious views from being reflected in public policy. Religion has had a major influence on the policies surrounding abortion in America, as shown by differing requirements in states, based on the amount of religious influence in particular states. There is also evidence that shows why the violence and harassment of abortion clinics have steadily declined since Roe v. Wade.

The main argument that most pro-life activists use is that the Bible says, “you shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13). From this quote and many others, they derive the belief that abortion is murder, and therefore wrong. However, how does one know when a fetus has a soul, and at what point does a fetus become a person? Pro-choice activists are often either less religious or not religious at all. They believe that the constitution gives a woman the right to privacy regarding medical matters including family planning (fwhc.org). Abortion became legal in America in 1973after the Supreme Court voted 7 to 2 in the case of Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court found that, “State criminal abortion laws, like those involved here…Violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy.” (religioustolerance.org). Since early 2005, many people believe if the legal case concerning abortion was taken back to the Supreme Court today, it would result in a 5 to 4 vote in favor of retaining Roe v. Wade (religioustolerance.org) due to the appointment of two new conservative and religious judges. However, that does not mean that almost half of Americans believe abortion should be outlawed and Roe v. Wade should be reversed.

In November of 1991, the state of Washington passed Initiative 120, which states that if Roe v. Wade was ever overturned, then Washington would continue their same laws and regulations on abortion. So far, Washington is the only state to take pre-emptive actions such as these. Washington has the largest percentage of people that are unaffiliated with a religion, with the number standing at 25% of their population (religioustolerance.org). Also, Washington is one of only five states that, in the case of a minor, does not require notification or consent from one or both of the parents. Also, mandatory counseling and a mandatory waiting period are not required, as opposed to Texas and Louisiana, where you must talk to a counselor and wait at least 24 hours before having an abortion. Washington is a wonderful example of a state that has a smaller religious influence than most other states and has more pro-choice and liberal policies toward abortion.

“Southerners and mid-westerners are more likely to believe abortion should not be permitted, while those in the west and northeast are more likely to think it should be generally available” says a 2003 poll by CBS News. This is because the “Bible Belt,” or the southern and mid-western states of America, have traditionally had more Christians than the rest of the country. In the southern region of the country, 33% of the populace believe abortion should be available, and 25% believe it should not. In the mid-western region of America 34% thought abortion should be available, and 25% thought abortion should not. However, in the western region, the number increase to 43% that support abortion, and only 16% believe abortion should not be permitted. The northeast area of the country also increased to 48% in the amount of people that believe that abortion should be available, and only 19% think it should be outlawed according to a CBS News poll.

The level of violence and harassments at abortion clinics has declined overall from the years of 1989 to 2004 according to Religious Tolerance.org. They show that the number of blockades has gone from 201 in 1989 to only 4 in 2004, and the number of murder attempts and the successful murders of abortion doctors have gone down from 12 in 1994 to 0 throughout 2001 to 2004. Studies have also shown that over time, the American generations have become less religious. For example, in people over 64, 47% considered themselves religious, and 7% considered themselves secular. As opposed to in younger people, ages 18 to 34, only 27% considered themselves religious, and 14% considered themselves secular (religioustolerance.org). This drop in religious influence over the years has contributed to the drop in religious extremist behavior in America.

Abortion is a very controversial issue that has been greatly influenced by religion in America. The difference in policy on abortion between various states and regions of the country are directly correlated to the amount of religious influence and activism each of them has. Also, over the years, American generations have become more tolerant and less religious, which in turn has caused a decrease in the pro-life movement.

Work Cited

“Is Abortion Wrong?” Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry. 1995

25 October 2007,

“Religious information in the U.S.: How American Adults View Themselves.” Religious Tolerance.org. 19 July 2007

24 October 2007,

“The Current Law on Abortion in WA State is Initiative 120 the Reproductive Privacy Act.” Feminist Women’s Health Center. 15 October 2007

24 October 2007, http://www.fwhc.org/abortion/120.htm

“Mandatory Delay and Biased Information Requirements.” Center for Representative Rights. 9 December 2005

24 October 2007 http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_fac_manddelay1.html

“Poll: Strong Support For Abortion Rights.” CBS News. 22 January 2003

24 October 2007 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/22/opinion/polls/main537570.shtml

“Violence and Harassment at U.S. Abortion Clinics.” Religious Tolerance.org 16 September 2004

24 October 2007 http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm

King James Version Holy Bible. Exod. 20-13. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2002.

My Idea of Success

The idea of success is a subjective thing that people must decide for themselves depending on their personal ambitions and goals. However, the media has some influence on how we view successful people. When I was little, I always dreamed of becoming a famous pop star like Britney Spears. I danced around in my pink tutu because my mom would not let me wear the skimpy clothes Britney would wear in her music videos, I put silly purple hair extensions in my hair, and sang “Baby One More Time” all around the house. I remember thinking that I sounded just like her, and if I could become a successful pop icon as well. Needless to say, my hopes and dreams have changed since then, and now I know that is not the kind of success I want. Hollywood and the media show successful people as having several multi-million dollar houses, flashy cars, and a plethora of fashion model lovers. However, I believe success should be measured by the amount of respect you have for yourself and others have for you, the love of your family, the ability to comfortably provide for that family, and lastly, knowing you left the world a better place.

Most celebrities are not in the media to show their respected achievements. Although they become famous through their hard work, determination, and talent, we often see them later in their careers for their flaws. Celebrities like Britney Spears and Paris Hilton are put on TV and talked about in the tabloids, not for showing their great accomplishments, but to make fun of them and show how bad they can mess up their lives, like getting DWI’s and going back to rehab. If I cannot wake up and look at myself in the mirror and feel proud of my achievements and what I have accomplished, then I do not respect myself, and therefore others will not respect me. I want everyone to treat me with respect, not because I was given lots of money by my family, but because I have earned it by working hard to achieve my goals. I feel that is part of what will make me successful.

Success is nothing without having someone to and share it with. It seems like a large number of celebrities get married, sometimes have or adopt children, and then get a divorce a few months or years later. Britney Spears, Jennifer Lopez, Drew Barrymore, and Carmen Electra are all examples of “successful” celebrities that were in marriages lasting under 8 months (about.com). I believe everyone should have significant people in their life that love them, whether it be a spouse, children, or a close longtime friend. I will feel that I have been successful in life if I have a loving husband and children that care about me.

Most people use the amount of material things they own as a measure of their success. There are entire shows like Cribs and My Super Sweet 16 that are designed to show the whole world all the expensive and flashy things celebrities have and what “success” can buy. I do not understand the concept of having three houses or five cars, other than to show off how selfish they are and how much money they have. You can only live in one house at a time and drive one car at a time. I also want to make money - who doesn’t? However, I do not wish to have multiple lavish homes that cost millions, and cars that cost more than most families’ annual income. I would like to be able to provide a good education for my children, a stable environment, and live in a comfortable and safe home in a good area. I would like to be able to provide stability for myself and my loved ones because if you are never home for your children, then that is not being overall successful in life.

I believe the most important question that I need to address when determining if I am successful is whether or not I feel that I will leave the world a better place. I will never feel truly successful if I make six figures working as a tobacco lobbyist, as opposed to being paid much less as a teacher or counselor helping improve people’s lives. Selling your soul to become rich is not success in my eyes, it is greedy and selfish.

The idea of determining whether you are successful is an individual decision. However, the media and how they portray celebrities contributes to how most people in our society evaluate their own success. I believe success is achieved when you respect yourself and others have respect for you. Also, when you have a loving family behind you and can provide for them comfortably. Finally, success is achieved when you feel you have contributed to the overall welfare of our species. All of these factors contribute to what makes a person truly successful in life.

Work Cited

Nina Callaway, “Shortest Celebrity Marriages,” About.com : weddings. 2002

8 October 2007 <http://weddings.about.com/cs/justforfun/a/ShortCelebWeds.htm>

Monday, November 12, 2007

The Oblivious Empire and The War on Terrorism

I found the article “The Oblivious Empire” very interesting and true. The author Mark Hertsgaard says the problem with Americans, is that we are oblivious of what our government is doing and therefore we are oblivious overseas. I agree with him on this subject. According to the Federal Election Commission, in 2004, 55.3% of eligible Americans voted for our next president, and in 2002, on 37% voted. What does this say about our society when just over half of Americans care enough to take 10 minutes out of there day, to decide who is the face of our country? It ways we are oblivious, and very irresponsible.

I also liked the cartoon “The War on Terrorism,” because it should give know somewhat educated American any excuse not to know what is going on in the world, and it should help get children more interested foreign affairs. As a little girl, I always wanted my dad to read me the funnies, and if this cartoon was in there, I would have wanted to know what it said.

Monday, November 5, 2007

Under the Sign of Mickey Mouse and Co.

I had never really thought about all of the American food, clothes, and entertainment that was not just in America but all over the world. This article by Todd Gitlin, made me think about how things like Disney world are not just an American icon for fun but for the whole world. I found it very interesting when Gitlin talks about our movie industry and said that they are all the same story line. If that is so true than why does American Hollywood movies dominate all over the world. Also, since America was founded by immigrants and is known as a melting pot of cultures than why is it such a bad thing? At least, in the McDonald's in other countries they change the menu to have that countries native food, and Coke has that countries language on the can. Do not think I'm not saying it's messed up having most of the countries in the world Americanized, because I'm not I'm just being the devil's advocate here.

Sunday, November 4, 2007

Religion for me growing up

My father’s family is very Catholic, and he always had to go to church every week growing up but wasn’t really religious. My mom, well I don’t know what she believes in, but when I was little she wanted me to at least be exposed to religion so she would take me to a Presbyterian church by our house of holidays. I wasn’t baptized until I was 6 years old. Talk about awkward feeling, standing in front of all those people and some of my family waiting with a few babies to have water but on my head. Religion has just never really made sense to me.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Compulsory Education, Wonderful or Flawed?

Compulsory education both empowers and disempowers the American population. First, we need to understand what compulsory really means, which is mandatory or forced. This does not necessarily mean that it is public or traditional school, it could be a private, religious, or home school as well. Our compulsory education system is not without some flaws. However, it has more benefits, like higher literacy rates, better understanding of and involvement with the government, and even increase personal health. I also have a few proposals for how to improve our public education system to make it even more empowering and inadvertently increase the overall welfare of our country.

A lack of funding for schools and teacher’s wages, as well as the unwillingness of students to learn, are a few reasons why our compulsory education system can be disempowering. In some situations, the schools are without adequate learning environments and their buildings are not suited for education. For example, in Still Separate, Still Unequal, one elementary school in the Bronx was in an old skating rink and had very overcrowded and stifling rooms with no area for recess (Kozol 244). However, as a whole, our nation is greatly more empowered by compulsory education because it raises the national standard of education and intelligence. Without mandatory education our national literacy rate would be much lower. According to the CIA’s 2003 estimates, 99% of American’s of the age of 15 and older can both read and write. We would not be one of the leading world powers if we did not have mandatory education. I was also unsuccessful in finding another world power that does not have compulsory education. The reality is that many people would not go to school if it was optional. In the early 1900’s, we did not have a mandatory public education system, so many parents would make their children work to help support their family. However, if they would have been able, economically, to let them go to school, then they would have been able to get better jobs and make more money in the long run. Having a more educated workforce is very important for a country if they want to advance in science and technology.

Although voting percentages are not as good as they could be, at 55.3% in the presidential election of 2004, it is higher than it would be without compulsory education. Having a country that is highly educated not only helps the country economically, but also with the nation’s overall health. In Journals of Health and Social Behaviors, Chia-Ling Wu and Catherine Ross of the University of Ohio State and Illinois, interviewed over 4,467 people, ranging in age from 18-90 over an 11 year period. They found that “the well educated, have better health than the poorly educated” (104). Therefore, if we become a more educated nation our country’s overall health will also increase. This would cause a slight drop in the costs of Medicaid and Medicare for our government. This saved money could then be used towards education.

For the sake of the future generations of American’s, we need to invest more into their compulsory education because our nation’s future depends on it. In 2003, the federal government spent about $58 billion on education for the country’s education system. However, in the same year they spent over $296 billion on “defense” and “homeland security.”(Heritage.org) I understand that our national defense is important and costly, but I think our country’s future is worth a little more than 1/5 of our present defense budget. Also, our teachers need to be payed more than they are right now. In order for teachers to be certified, they must have at least a bachelor’s in education minor or major. They then must go through teacher certification for the given subjects they want to teach. According to the National Education Association, in 2004 the average teacher’s salary in Texas was $40,476 a year. However, according to the American Census Bureau, the average annual earnings of a worker with a bachelor’s degree will earn $51,206. It does not make much sense that a person working as a teacher should make such a low salary when we entrust them with the minds of our nation’s future.

Compulsory education in America is both empowering and disempowering. However, we must not focus on whether it is one or the other, but instead on how we can improve the education system for the future of America. Without public education, our nation would not be as economically or technologically advanced as we are today.

Work Cited

Jonathan Kozol, “Still Separate, Still Unequal.” Rereading America, Seventh Edition, Bedford/ St.Martin’s: MITP, 2005. 239-256

“The World Factbook United States.” CIA- The World Factbook. 6 September 2007

16 September 2007 <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/us.html>

“National Voting Turnout in Federal Elections: 1960-2004.” Infoplease. 2007

16 September 2007

Chia-Ling Wu (Ohio State University), Catherine Ross (University of Illinois), “Education, Age, and the Cumulative Advantages of Education.” Journals of Health and Social Behaviors: Vol. 37 No. 1. March 1996

16 September 2007 <http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-1465%28199603%2937%3A1%3C104%3AEAATCA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage> MITP, 1996. 104-120

Brian M. Riedl, “$20,000 per Household: The Highest Level of Federal Spending Since World War II.” The Heritage Foundation. 3 December 2003

16 September 2007

Washington (AP), “Teachers paid an average salary of $46,752, survey finds.” USA Today

25 June 2005

16 September 2007